| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. In simplest terms, what is wrong with EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
13kr1d1 wrote: Marcia en Welle wrote: Marcus Tedric wrote: The 'problem' with EVE in this respect is quite arguably very simple - that there are no consequences. Concord is the consequence in high sec. Although the OP chose to forgo tha...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.24 11:37:12
|
2. In simplest terms, what is wrong with EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marcus Tedric wrote: The 'problem' with EVE in this respect is quite arguably very simple - that there are no consequences. Concord is the consequence in high sec. Although the OP chose to forgo that protection by agreeing to a duel. It is p...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.24 11:24:42
|
3. In simplest terms, what is wrong with EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So in a game about killing internet spaceships your internet spaceship got killed? Baffling.
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.24 11:08:13
|
4. Old cloaking habits back? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Backward step from CCP.
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.24 10:34:58
|
5. Tempest Justice Edition skin issue - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I hope that name is work in progress too, as Tempest Justice Edition sounds awful. Seriously CCP, get someone new in the naming department, or hire someone professional who has a good grasp of the English language. Justice Edition sounds like som...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.23 10:50:37
|
6. Blighted weaponry (affectionately known as glass cannons) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Caleb Seremshur wrote: Alvatore DiMarco wrote: Caleb Seremshur wrote: Ya'll need to stop getting mad at videogames. Complaining about the name is silly. This isn't a game where the backstory and overall plot is taken very seriously by mo...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.23 10:45:13
|
7. Blighted weaponry (affectionately known as glass cannons) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Goliath wrote: I'm asking this only because I'm interested in words generally, and am likewise interested in the strong reaction to "blighted". (Disclaimer: I have no skin in this name game, am not participating in the discussion that Par...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.22 14:14:28
|
8. Blighted weaponry (affectionately known as glass cannons) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Blighted? Is the naming guy ex WOW or something? Can you hire someone new in the naming department, I want something more sci fi, blighted sounds like fantasy.
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.22 14:10:48
|
9. Tech 3 Destroyers coming in RHEA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Marcia en Welle wrote: Only 3 operating modes, that is stupid... Dumbed down for the masses as usual. I hope they don't try and rebalance T3s and dumb down the current 1024 possible subsystem configurations to just 3. A ...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.21 22:11:53
|
10. Tech 3 Destroyers coming in RHEA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Only 3 operating modes, that is stupid... Dumbed down for the masses as usual. I hope they don't try and rebalance T3s and dumb down the current 1024 possible subsystem configurations to just 3. A proper T3 destroyer would have been much better, a...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.21 21:10:02
|
11. Sticky:[Phoebe] Stealth Bombers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I am all for these changes to bombers. But changing the cloaking mechanic is regressive and adds no gameplay benefit alongside having lots of unintended side effects to many other areas of the game. Yes, bombers used to decloak each other, but th...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.10.20 12:05:00
|
12. Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate me. I'm getting "There was an error while validating your account, please try again"
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.07.15 09:45:00
|
13. Why is it even possible to instalock a Ceptor? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Because everything is possible to Gǣinstalock.Gǥ Interceptors are not some magical exception to the rules. Theoretically, if a ship can align below 1 second, then it should be impossible to lock.
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.07 18:47:00
|
14. What is it like running a corporation...? In my eyes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doll Face wrote: Between this time and now, we've got two player owned stations, three offices, a website, a teamspeak server, have had a peak of almost 40 members, and have started selling ammunition, minerals and ore on the corporations behal...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.07 12:06:00
|
15. Top 5 Articles this week on www.minerbumping.com - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ane I was hoping eve forums were just entering a golden age with the bannation of Erotica, shame about her acolytes still making threads like this one. Hopefully this will just be a blip on the horizon of an otherwise serene ocean of forum posts.
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.07 08:16:00
|
16. Reworking the Marauder Class - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: DrysonBennington wrote: I think that the Marauder Class of battleships needs to have Marauder Class Frigates and Cruisers added to the class. The smaller Marauder Class ships would have similar traits as that of the bat...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.06 22:05:00
|
17. Kicking the dead horse: inactive players and corporations edition - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Caleb Seremshur wrote: 3: I want to call my corp something - oh look a guy made a corp with a similar name 6 years ago and hasn't logged in in over 5 years. It's a self explanatory issue. This thread is basically, 'someone else has a name whi...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.05 13:18:00
|
18. Mining wrecks for ore: A circular economy for EVE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I didn't read the whole post, but I think it is a good idea. Basically you are saying that wrecks should yield more than simply rig components, which would make a lot of sense both gameplay wise and also lore wise. Would also make salvaging profe...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.05 13:04:00
|
19. Expel member at next down time - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Basically, Kaarous is telling you that you need to have 3 corps, one as a feeder corp for another feeder corp which is a feeder corp for the proper corp. Otherwise you are not doing it right. Also you leapt to the defence of WH corps Kaarous, bec...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.05 08:03:00
|
20. Expel member at next down time - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maxoss Ataru wrote: I have since re-petitioned for two reasons. First is that the member, who we cannot kick, has started using racist language in emails to the corp. The second is that he was gloating about how he caused one of our members to ...
- by Marcia en Welle - at 2014.04.04 18:29:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |